Modular Approaches to CO2 Capture Technologies
- 24 March 2026
- Capture
The status and potential of the modular carbon capture plant construction, targeting the power and industry sectors.
This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
Adam Rice, Paul Fennell, Niall Mac Dowell
Citation: IEAGHG, "Air Quality Implications of Post Combustion Capture in Industrial Processes", IEAGHG Report 2026-01, March 2026, doi.org/10.62849/2026-01
Retrofitting existing emission sources with carbon capture systems can alter the emission profile. Emissions of some pollutants[1] may decrease, others may increase, and new substances could be introduced into the environment.[2] Established permitting frameworks, measurement techniques, and emission control approaches in other industrial contexts provide a basis for regulatory assessment of post combustion CO2 capture (PCC) in industrial processes*.
Previous comprehensive literature reviews on the impact of carbon capture and storage (CCS) deployment on air quality have primarily focused on the coal and natural gas power industries or have not addressed the impacts on co-pollutants (SEPA, 2015; Buvik et al., 2021; Gibbins, Lucquiaud and Samson, 2024; Rochelle, 2024)[3]. The industrial sector is a significant contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions, contributing around 25 % (GCCSI, 2016), with key industries such as cement, iron and steel, and refining being responsible for a broad spectrum of pollutants beyond carbon dioxide (CO2).
Therefore, there is a clear need for a comprehensive study such as this one. A team of Independent experts from Imperial College London, led by Prof Paul Fennell, were commissioned via Imperial Consultants to undertake this work, which assesses the air pollutant implications of CCS retrofit in heavy industry by comparing baseline emissions from representative host facilities in the cement, iron and steel, and refining sectors prior to capture with emissions expected following CCS integration. A gap analysis was also conducted to identify research areas that are currently underexplored, and the study investigates potential synergies between existing air quality control technologies and CCS systems.
[1] Such as sulphur dioxide, nitrous oxides, and particulate matter.
[2] Pollutants other than CO2 are referred to as “co-pollutants”.
[3] The authors are unaware of existing literature reviews examining the impact of CCS deployment in industries and projects that combust biomass or materials with high biogenic content, such as waste-to-energy (WtE) and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). This report does not specifically address biomass combustion. However, studies in this field were included when relevant for context.
Members gain exclusive access to all of our publications for the first six months, after which the content becomes free to view to the general public. If you are from organisations based in member countries, you can also request access to member-only publications.
Already an existing member? Make sure you’re logged in to view your exclusive member content.
Our authoritative, peer-reviewed publications cover topics that include carbon capture, transport, storage, monitoring, regulation, and more.
View All PublicationsGet essential news and updates from the CCS sector and the IEAGHG by email.
Whatever you would like to know, our dedicated team of experts is here to help you. Just drop us an email and we will get back to you as soon as we can.
Contact Us Now