This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.

Technology Collaboration Programme by IEA

Co-Production of Hydrogen and Electricity by Coal Gasification with CO₂ Capture

Technical Report

1 September 2007

Capture

L. Valota

Citation: IEAGHG, "Co-production of Hydrogen and Electricty by Coal Gasification with CO₂ Capture", 2007-13, October 2007.

Download The Full Publication Now

Publication Overview

The primary purpose of this study is the evaluation of the technologies and the process alternatives that can be used in these complex power and hydrogen generation schemes to optimise efficiency and capital cost and reduce, at the same time, emissions to the atmosphere.Use of hydrogen storage is considered to match the hydrogen demand.

Publication Summary

The primary scope of the study is the evaluation of plant scenarios to satisfy the future demands of hydrogen and electricity for the Netherlands and for the USA, based on the monthly consumptions of years 2004 and 2005. The scenarios are compared on the basis of the electricity production cost, at fixed hydrogen price (9.5 €cent/Nm3) and considering the underground hydrogen storage capital cost of 1.5 €/kg.

The most important conclusions of the study are:

  • The preferred scenario is by far Scenario 5, including flexible co-production plants with gaseous hydrogen underground storage. In this scenario for the Netherlands the electricity production cost is 0.080 €/kWh vs. 0.090 €/kWh of the scenario including non-flexible co-production plants and hydrogen storages, and even higher costs for the other scenarios without storage. The same conclusion applies also to the USA case.
  • Making reference to more detailed data of energy consumption on an hourly basis, the number of required co-production plants decreases and the electricity production cost for the Netherlands in Scenario 5 becomes 0.075 €/kWh.
  • The capital cost of gaseous underground storage varies widely between 1 €/kg and 40 €/kg, depending on the geological configuration of the area, based on available studies on the subject. The comparison among different plant scenarios depends on this cost. For this reason a sensitivity analysis has been performed evaluating the electricity production cost and the underground storage capital cost for each scenario (see graph I.7.1 of this report). Scenario 5 (flexible co-production plants + hydrogen storage) remains the winning choice for a hydrogen storage cost lower than approximately 20 €/kg; for higher costs the impact of the storage on investment cost becomes too high and both alternatives with hydrogen storage appear uncompetitive.
  • One concern of gaseous underground storage is the possible contamination of hydrogen with other gases such as H2S and CH4. For this reason a cost allowance for a hydrogen purification unit has been considered in the scenarios including storage. Another concern is the possibility of leakage of hydrogen through the storage walls, which is strongly dependent on the type of storage environment (for example the leaks in underground caverns are evaluated to be 1-3% of the total volume per year).
  • Other types of hydrogen storage have been evaluated; liquefied storage and aboveground storage have been excluded because of their huge cost; storage in metal hydride form is not suitable for large quantities; storage of hydrogen in pipelines poses significant challenges and costs

Download Publication

Access the complete publication in PDF format.

Download Now

Related Publications

View similar publications.

View All Publications
Technical Report

The Value of Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage (DACCS)

  • 4 September 2025
  • Capture

The aim of this study is to evaluate the value of direct air capture and storage (DACCS) in the energy transition (down to the regional level), accounting for key factors, including carbon removal eiciency, timeliness, durability, land footprint and techno-economic performance.

Technical Report

Power CCS: Potential for cost reductions and improvements

  • 5 August 2024
  • Capture
  • Costs of CCUS

CCS, in the context of power CCS technologies, will be an essential component of the portfolio of technologies required to reach net-zero emissions in the power sector. This study explores the potential to reduce the cost and accelerate the uptake of power CCS technologies.

Technical Review

7th Post-Combustion Capture Conference Summary

  • 1 April 2024
  • Capture
  • Event Proceedings

The 7th edition of the Post Combustion Capture Conference (PCCC-7) was held on the 25?28 September 2023 and was jointly hosted by the IEAGHG, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) and sponsored by Worley, Shell, and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. (MHI).

Technical Report

Clean steel an environmental and technoeconomic outlook of a disruptive technology

  • 1 March 2024
  • Capture
  • Costs of CCUS

This study primarily presents a comparative analysis of steelmaking pathways to cost-effectively decarbonise a steel mill, taking a life-cycle perspective on associated environmental impacts. The roll-out of clean steel technologies is envisioned to have a significant implication for support infrastructure. Therefore, a secondary objective of the study is to gain insights into the primary energy and infrastructure implications associated with large-scale deployment of different steel decarbonisation pathways. Clean steel production will likely be more expensive than steel produced today; this poses additional economic strains on steel producers and consumers. Consequently, a third objective is to estimate the price premium that clean steel could command in existing and future markets. Further, this study formulates recommendations for key stakeholders to support the sector and outlines recommendations for further work.

Technical Report

Techno-Economic Assessment of Small-Scale Carbon Capture for Industrial and Power Systems

  • 1 March 2024
  • Capture
  • Costs of CCUS

This study, undertaken on behalf of IEAGHG by Element Energy (now a part of ERM), explores the role of CCS in decarbonising small-scale industry and power generation applications. While relatively under investigated compared to their larger scale counterparts, reaching net zero will be dependent on successfully addressing the emissions from small-scale facilities. The findings from the study will be of interest to the broader energy community but, in particular, should benefit project developers, the finance community and policymakers.

Technical Review

9th HTSLCN Meeting Report

  • 21 September 2023
  • Capture
  • Event Proceedings

The 9th High Temperature Solid Looping Cycles Network (HTSLCN) Meeting took place from 14th to 15th March 2023 at Palazzo Farnese in Piacenza, Italy, hosted by the CLEANKER consortium. 82 attendees enjoyed a two-day programme with a total of 28 presentations, the official closure of the CLEANKER project with a visit to the pilot plant, a relaxing dinner and a guided tour in the museum of Palazzo Farnese about the millennial history of the city of Piacenza and its territory, from the preRoman age to the XX century.

Our most recent publications

Our authoritative, peer-reviewed publications cover topics that include carbon capture, transport, storage, monitoring, regulation, and more.

View All Publications
Technical Review

Risk Management and Monitoring Networks Combined Meeting Report

  • 15 January 2026
  • Event Proceedings
  • Storage

Two IEAGHG expert networks, the Risk Management Network and the Monitoring Network, held a combined meeting from 27th to 28th August 2025 in The Hague, The Netherlands. Both networks have been convening for 20 years, and this meeting, hosted by Shell at the Shell Centre, represented the 11th Risk Management and the 15th Monitoring meeting.

Technical Report

CO2 Transport and Storage Availability

  • 28 November 2025
  • Storage
  • Transport

The objective of this study is to investigate realistic rates of CO2 Transport and Storage operational availability that may be achievable for future systems, with a focus primarily on pipeline transportation and storage within sedimentary basins (saline aquifers and depleted fields).

Technical Report

CO2 Transport and Storage Cost Review

  • 9 October 2025
  • Costs of CCUS
  • Storage
  • Transport

The objective of the study was to review publicly available information on CO2 transport and storage (T&S) costs, to provide insights into how typical cost estimates are built up and to inform on areas of risk. Current information on T&S costs and the need for new or improved data would be explored.

Get the latest CCS news and insights

Get essential news and updates from the CCS sector and the IEAGHG by email.

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Whatever you would like to know, our dedicated team of experts is here to help you. Just drop us an email and we will get back to you as soon as we can.

Contact Us Now