This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
Duncan Barker, Daniel Holmes, James Hunt, Philip Napier-Moore, Simon Turner, Michael Clark (Whitehopleman)
Citation: IEAGHG, "CO₂ Capture in the Cement Industry", 2008-03, July 2008.
The scope of the study was to:
The cement industry has made considerable strides in reducing CO₂ emissions but to make further major emission reductions CO₂ capture is required. The addition of CO₂ capture to new build cement plants to significantly reduce CO₂ emissions is technically feasible. Both post combustion and oxy-combustion options can be considered although the oxy-combustion option is not technically mature enough for deployment yet. Pre-combustion capture would be less suitable for cement plants because it would not capture the CO₂ from carbonate mineral decomposition, which account for about two thirds of the CO₂ from a modern cement plant.
The estimated costs of post combustion capture at new build cements plants are €107/tonne of CO₂ emissions avoided (US$161/t) for a 1 Mt/y European cement plant and €59/t (US$88/t) for a 3 Mt/y Asian plant. Use of alternative solvents and integration with an adjacent power plant could more than halve the costs. Oxy-combustion offers the lowest cost solution for CO₂ capture at new-build cement plants but further research and development is needed to address a number of technical issues to enable this technique to be deployed. Costs are estimated to be €40/tonne (US$60/t) of CO₂ avoided for a 1 Mt/y European cement plant and €23/t (US$34/t) for a 3 Mt/y plant in Asia.
The cost of CO₂ capture at a cement plant using oxy-combustion is expected to be similar to the cost of capture at a typical coal-fired power plant. The quantity of oxygen required per tonne of CO₂ captured is about three times lower at a cement plant but the economies of scale are less favourable. The cost of post combustion capture at a cement plant is expected to be substantially higher than at a power plant, mainly because of lower economies of scale and the need to install FGD, DeNOx and a boiler to provide steam for the regeneration of CO₂ capture solvent.
Post combustion capture could be readily retrofitted to existing cement plants provided sufficient space is available. Substantial rebuilding would be necessary to accommodate an oxy-combustion retrofit but this may nevertheless be the least cost option.
Our authoritative, peer-reviewed publications cover topics that include carbon capture, transport, storage, monitoring, regulation, and more.
View All Publications
Get essential news and updates from the CCS sector and the IEAGHG by email.
Whatever you would like to know, our dedicated team of experts is here to help you. Just drop us an email and we will get back to you as soon as we can.
Contact Us Now