This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.

Technology Collaboration Programme by IEA

Measurement, reporting and verification and accounting for carbon dioxide removal in the context of both project-based approaches and national greenhouse gas inventories

Paul Zakkour, Greg Cook

Citation: IEAGHG, “Measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) and accounting for carbon dioxide removal (CDR) in the context of both project-based approaches and national greenhouse gas inventories (NGHGI)”, 2024-09, October 2024, doi.org/10.62849/2024-09

Download The Full Publication Now
Measurement, reporting and verification and accounting for carbon dioxide removal in the context of both project-based approaches and national greenhouse gas inventories

Overview

The subtle shift in emphasis away from a focus on reducing and eliminating GHG emissions (as in the quantified emission limitation and reduction targets of the Kyoto Protocol) towards net zero framing has shone a new light on the role and potential of GHG removal (GGR) or CDR in climate change mitigation[1]. Today, there is growing acceptance that CDR methods are needed to offset some ongoing, hard-to-abate, residual anthropogenic GHG emission sources to achieve and thereafter maintain a state of net zero (IPCC 2022).

The aim of this study is to provide a synthesised technical assessment of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) methods and review their measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) features and accounting aspects.

Summary

  • Reasons persist for being both positive and circumspect about the role of CDR in climate action. On the one hand, CDR seems essential for achieving the Paris Agreement. On the other hand, CDR poses significant challenges for climate policy.
  • A number of MRV efforts are underway today by private and public actors in both the voluntary carbon markets (VCM) and compliance (regulated) carbon markets. The discussions and outcomes from these processes will have clear ramifications for the way in which MRV approaches and methodologies will be used to calculate and verify CDR actions in future. Yet, at time of writing, much debate and uncertainty remain regarding the best means of doing so.
  • The technical review of CDR methods highlights that questions remain over the foundational science (except relating to engineered geological storage and biological capture and storage) and/or social acceptance underpinning most CDR methods. As such, the view that a portfolio of CDR methods is likely to be needed to meet the Paris Agreement is reaffirmed.
  • For CDR methods such as soil organic carbon (SOC), enhanced weathering (EW) and ocean-based CDR, challenges persist for monitoring CO2 flux rates, carbon (C) stock changes and the fate and behaviour of C carriers in the environment. Despite indications that a CO2 drawdown effect can be expected, monitoring of field trials have in many cases been unable to corroborate these hypotheses.
  • Recent focus has been almost exclusively on developing project-based methodologies, which are inherently consequential and rely on baseline scenarios and counterfactuals that are notoriously difficult to establish. Thus, related additionality testing in credit schemes has been subject to widespread criticism.
  • Two critical issues for the current approach to CDR crediting/certification exist:
    • Policy utility: If certified/credited CDR activities do not create a symmetrical[1] and equivalent amount of CDR in the host country national greenhouse gas inventory (NGHGI) – a problem that can be termed ‘inventory visibility’ – then any policy designed to incentivise CDR will lack political utility.
    • Long-term responsibility: Host countries are ultimately the ‘underwriter of last resort’ for carbon reversal, i.e. they will need to take very long term responsibility for the carbon storage and manage the risk of carbon reversal. Better understanding of the liability of any carbon reversals may impair countries’ willingness to host CDR activities, a problem that can be further exacerbated by inventory visibility.
  • Ocean-based CDR methods pose unique challenges in these regards: since the C reservoir falls outside of national MRV frameworks, any CO2 drawdown will be neither visible in any country’s NGHGI nor subject to any host country monitoring that could offer to accept liability for carbon reversal. Until these challenges are addressed, ocean-based CDR will not meet UNFCCC accounting standards.

Download Publication

Access the complete publication in PDF format.

Download Now

Related Publications

View similar publications.

View All Publications
Technical Review

Insurance Coverage for CO2 Storage Projects

  • 16 August 2024
  • Industry Insights
  • Storage

This report is a focused review of recent developments regarding insurance coverage for carbon dioxide (CO2) geological storage projects. It seeks to address the following: what companies are offering or planning to offer insurance to CO2 storage projects, what is the scope and duration of the coverage offered, and does coverage extend to the transportation of CO2 to the project site? This work and report was prepared by Franz Hiebert.

Technical Report

The Role of Indices in Assessing the Maturity of CCUS Technologies and their Readiness for Deployment

  • 1 February 2024
  • Industry Insights

This study was undertaken on behalf of IEAGHG by Foresight Transitions Ltd. While a technology may be technically mature, it has become increasingly clear that the technology may not necessarily be considered commercially ‘bankable’ by investors. In this study, the potential for an index or indices to provide that confidence was explored. The findings from the study will be of interest to the broader energy community but, in particular, should benefit technology developers, CCUS end users, investors and policymakers.

Technical Report

International Standards and Testing for Novel Carbonaceous Building Materials

  • 1 December 2023
  • Policy & Regulation
  • Utilisation

Over 4 billion tonnes of cement are produced each year, equating to approximately 8% of global anthropogenic CO2 emissions, and this industry will continue to grow with the expansion of the built environment at a time that emissions need to be reduced. The utilisation or reduction of CO2 within cement, concrete and building materials could be a valuable way to contribute to emissions reductions in the sector , but there are several barriers, including the current state of standards, regulations and policies. This study will provide useful information for the technical and research community, the CCUS industry, the construction industry, and policymakers, providing an unbiased and non-prescriptive evaluation of international standards and testing relevant to novel carbonaceous building materials to address some of those barriers. The market potential for CO2 utilisation processes in the construction industry is also investigated, and the methods for certifying and measuring embodied carbon content of carbonated building materials is evaluated and the challenges therein.

Technical Report

Methologies and Technologies for Mitigation

  • 1 December 2023
  • Industry Insights

The driver behind this study is to develop a report built on the on the previous IEAGHG report on methods of leakage mitigation (2007/11). The proposed study should focus on current mitigation and remediation methods that may be applied or considered in site specific conditions in the event of unpredicted CO2 migration. Each geological storage site will have an adaptive site specific monitoring plan, based on a risk assessment. Detection of a significant irregularity may involve supplementing the monitoring program, in order to detect a possible leak and if necessary engaging mitigation measures.

Technical Review

A bibliometric analysis of GHGT abstract submissions

  • 14 June 2023
  • Industry Insights

This technical review provides an insight into how the focus of research in the field of Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) has evolved across a decade, from 2012–2022. It is designed to help understand where the most research has been conducted, and to see where CCUS research is going.

Technical Report

Integrating CCS in international cooperation and carbon markets under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement

  • 18 January 2023
  • Policy & Regulation

This work assesses the status of and outlooks for international cooperation under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and considers how approaches could support the deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS). It provides an up-to-date look at the Article 6 rules, the types of markets and mechanisms that could evolve, and the units that could be traded. It then considers how Article 6 could apply to CCS through linked emissions trading systems, crediting systems and alternative approaches.

Technical Report

Applying ISO Standards to Geologic Storage and EOR Projects

  • 1 September 2022
  • Policy & Regulation
  • Storage

The work aims to summarise and synthesise the two ISO Standards relevant to the geological storage of CO2: – ISO 27914:2017 (‘Carbon dioxide capture, transportation and geological storage – Geological storage’) and ISO 27916:2019 (‘Carbon dioxide capture, transportation and geological storage – Carbon dioxide storage using enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR)’) – to provide a high-level understanding of the content into an easily digestible format. By comparison with international regulatory frameworks, and providing case studies of how applicable the standards are to real CO2 storage projects, the study provides a comprehensive overview and concludes on the usefulness of the documents in supporting the implementation of CCUS projects. For the purposes of this overview, the standards will hereafter be referred to as ISO 27914 and ISO 27916

Technical Review

CCUS in national GHG inventories

  • 28 June 2021
  • Policy & Regulation

This report builds upon previous IEAGHG studies on the topic of carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) in order to assess the potential of a portfolio of CCU technologies to contribute towards Japan’s climate change mitigation goals in 2030 and 2050.

Technical Review

Exporting CO2 for Offshore Storage – The London Protocol’s Export Amendment and Associated Guidelines and Guidance

  • 12 April 2021
  • Policy & Regulation
  • Storage

The London Convention and London Protocol are the global treaties that protect the marine environment from pollution caused by the dumping of wastes. Since 2006, the London Protocol has provided a basis in international environmental law to allow carbon dioxide (CO2) storage beneath the seabed when it is safe to do so, and to regulate the injection of CO2 into sub-seabed geological formations for permanent isolation. However, Article 6 of the London Protocol prohibits the export of waste or other matter for dumping in the marine environment. Therefore in 2019, Contracting Parties to the London Protocol adopted a resolution to allow provisional application of the 2009 amendment to Article 6 of the Protocol to allow export of CO2 for storage in sub-seabed geological formations in advance of its ratification, which was progressing slowly.

Our most recent publications

Our authoritative, peer-reviewed publications cover topics that include carbon capture, transport, storage, monitoring, regulation, and more.

View All Publications
Technical Report

Geological Storage of CO2: Seal Integrity Review

  • 10 September 2024
  • Storage

This comprehensive seal integrity review, undertaken by CO2CRC on behalf of IEAGHG, provides a detailed, updated exploration of the critical aspects of seal potential in the context of the geological storage of CO2.

Technical Review

Insurance Coverage for CO2 Storage Projects

  • 16 August 2024
  • Industry Insights
  • Storage

This report is a focused review of recent developments regarding insurance coverage for carbon dioxide (CO2) geological storage projects. It seeks to address the following: what companies are offering or planning to offer insurance to CO2 storage projects, what is the scope and duration of the coverage offered, and does coverage extend to the transportation of CO2 to the project site? This work and report was prepared by Franz Hiebert.

Technical Review

CO2 Storage Site Catalogue

  • 8 August 2024
  • Storage

This Technical Review provides an overview of 22 CO2 storage sites from around the world. These include CO2-EOR, commercial scale storage sites and a number of pilot and demonstration storage sites in both depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs and saline reservoirs. Its primary aim is to provide a convenient source of collated information with a specific focus on technical information that are in the public domain.

Technical Report

Power CCS: Potential for cost reductions and improvements

  • 5 August 2024
  • Capture
  • Costs of CCUS

CCS, in the context of power CCS technologies, will be an essential component of the portfolio of technologies required to reach net-zero emissions in the power sector. This study explores the potential to reduce the cost and accelerate the uptake of power CCS technologies.

Technical Review

7th Post-Combustion Capture Conference Summary

  • 1 April 2024
  • Capture
  • Event Proceedings

The 7th edition of the Post Combustion Capture Conference (PCCC-7) was held on the 25?28 September 2023 and was jointly hosted by the IEAGHG, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) and sponsored by Worley, Shell, and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. (MHI).

Technical Report

Clean steel an environmental and technoeconomic outlook of a disruptive technology

  • 1 March 2024
  • Capture
  • Costs of CCUS

This study primarily presents a comparative analysis of steelmaking pathways to cost-effectively decarbonise a steel mill, taking a life-cycle perspective on associated environmental impacts. The roll-out of clean steel technologies is envisioned to have a significant implication for support infrastructure. Therefore, a secondary objective of the study is to gain insights into the primary energy and infrastructure implications associated with large-scale deployment of different steel decarbonisation pathways. Clean steel production will likely be more expensive than steel produced today; this poses additional economic strains on steel producers and consumers. Consequently, a third objective is to estimate the price premium that clean steel could command in existing and future markets. Further, this study formulates recommendations for key stakeholders to support the sector and outlines recommendations for further work.

Get the latest CCS news and insights

Get essential news and updates from the CCS sector and the IEAGHG by email.

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Whatever you would like to know, our dedicated team of experts is here to help you. Just drop us an email and we will get back to you as soon as we can.

Contact Us Now