This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.

Technology Collaboration Programme by IEA

Current State of Knowledge Regarding the Risk of Induced Seismicity at CO₂ Storage Projects

Technical Report

1 January 2022

Storage

Seyyed Hosseini, Susan Horvorka, Alexandros Savvaidis, Florentina Kavoura, Jean-Philippe Nicot

Citation: IEAGHG, "Current State of Knowledge Regarding the Risk of Induced Seismicity at CO₂ Storage Projects", 2022-02, January 2022.

Download The Full Publication Now

Publication Overview

The primary objective of this study is to summarize the levels of induced seismicity observed in or near CO₂ storage sites, and the consequences of the induced seismicity in terms of impact on people, as well as the environment, assets and reputation of operators, authorities, and on CCS technology. A second objective is to gain an understanding on processes that industry and authorities employ to manage the risk of induced seismicity. A third objective is to present notable case studies where outreach measures have supported operators and regulators in managing concerns of stakeholders in connection with induced seismicity. The final task of the study is to identify current research and innovation trends to better manage the risk of induced seismicity.

Publication Summary

  • Investigation into the link between induced seismicity and very large-scale waste water disposal has advanced significantly since the 2013 IEAGHG review of induced seismicity. Seismic monitoring of CO₂ storage sites has also led to a better understanding of the phenomenon especially the propagation of microseismic events.
  • The use of sophisticated monitoring techniques has been refined and enabled enhanced event location and improved model calibration. Evidence from microseismic detection techniques at demonstration CO₂ storage sites has also revealed temporal correlations with periods of high injection rate and bottom-hole pressure. There is no evidence of felt seismicity at any of the 36 CO₂ storage sites reviewed in this study with the exception of one CO₂-EOR (enhanced oil recovery) site.
  • Monitoring microseismicity at CO₂ storage sites has revealed events are more common during perturbations in flow, including shutdowns, than they are during injection.
  • The analysis of geomechanical responses in reservoirs can contribute to the assessment of the risk of felt seismicity caused by pressure perturbations within a project area. Geomechanical modelling is therefore of critical importance and requires verification with measured parameters.
  • Large-scale waste water disposal has a clear association with induced seismicity across some regions of the south – central US. However, it is important to recognize that natural pre-existing tectonic stresses can be triggered by pressure changes induced by fluid injection. Some regions of the US, such as North Dakota near the Canadian border, and in the northeast US, exhibit a relative lack of felt seismicity, despite waste water disposal.
  • Historical evidence, that predates large-scale waste water disposal, also shows that natural tectonic activity has been responsible for seismicity across the south – central and other regions of the US.
  • Waste-water disposal intervals at a depth of ~2km, for example in Oklahoma, can have related seismic hypocenters at an estimated depth of ~5km in the crystalline basement.
  • Other factors can complicate when seismic events might occur. Stress can be transferred to deeper fault zones that are critically stressed and susceptible to slip. This mechanism may have been responsible for the Castor event off the north-east coast of Spain. Earthquake to earthquake interaction is also possible where accumulated stress from previously seismically non-active regions can be affected.
  • In response to concerns associated with induced seismicity in the US a series of precautionary operational measures were introduced. These have included mandatory injection into higher stratigraphic formations, significant volumetric reductions in waste water injection or, in some cases, complete cessation and a ban on new disposal wells in close proximity to known regional faults. Seismic monitoring plans also need to be implemented and include tests to detect the presence of faults. Specific regulations depend on each state.
  • Regulatory authorities have defined rules and expectations for permits, incorporating in most cases, past earthquake data (distance of seismicity from the well and magnitude of events) and
  • Characterization of subsurface hazards. In some cases (Canada, Oklahoma, Ohio, UK), the operator has to follow a traffic light system that “controls” its actions and provides guidance on risk mitigation based on an earthquake magnitude threshold. This depends on each country or state.
  • Causes of seismicity at specific locations need to be clearly explained especially to local communities that may be affected by CO₂ storage sites. For example, in Japan natural seismicity is a regular occurrence, and felt events are not uncommon, consequently the origin of such events needs to be conveyed so that they cannot be associated with a CO₂ storage site. In another example, and in contrast, geothermal energy produced from the Geysers field is actively monitored because of the link between the field’s operations and induced seismicity. Successful proactive outreach policies at the Tomakomai CO₂ storage demonstration site in Japan, and the Geysers geothermal field in California, have demonstrated how seismic origin, and its potential impacts, can be effectively communicated

Download Publication

Access the complete publication in PDF format.

Download Now

Related Publications

View similar publications.

View All Publications
Technical Review

Insurance Coverage for CO₂ Storage Projects

  • 16 August 2024
  • Industry Insights
  • Storage

This report is a focused review of recent developments regarding insurance coverage for carbon dioxide (CO₂) geological storage projects. It seeks to address the following: what companies are offering or planning to offer insurance to CO₂ storage projects, what is the scope and duration of the coverage offered, and does coverage extend to the transportation of CO₂ to the project site? This work and report was prepared by Franz Hiebert.

Technical Review

CO₂ Storage Site Catalogue

  • 8 August 2024
  • Storage

This Technical Review provides an overview of 22 CO₂ storage sites from around the world. These include CO₂-EOR, commercial scale storage sites and a number of pilot and demonstration storage sites in both depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs and saline reservoirs. Its primary aim is to provide a convenient source of collated information with a specific focus on technical information that are in the public domain.

Technical Review

6th International Workshop on Offshore Geologic CO₂ Storage

  • 1 December 2023
  • Event Proceedings
  • Storage

The 6th International Workshop on Offshore Geologic CO₂ Storage was held in Aberdeen on 13-14 September. Organised with the University of Texas and hosted by the University of Aberdeen. The loca on was very appropriate as we were co-hosted and sponsored by Storegga who leads the Acorn project nearby in Scotland. This project had been recently announced by the UK government as a Track 2 Cluster project. This 6th workshop had 190 delegates (60 in-person and 130 virtual) from 35 countries, with a good mix of industry, researchers and regulators.

Technical Review

Monitoring Network Meeting Report

  • 1 December 2023
  • Event Proceedings
  • Storage

The IEAGHG Monitoring Network aims to assess new technologies and techniques in the monitoring of CO₂ storage, determine the limitations, accuracy and applicability of monitoring techniques, disseminate information from research and pilot storage projects around the world, develop extensive monitoring guidelines for the different sub-categories of geological storage; oil and gas fields, unmineable coal seams, and saline aquifers covering the differing conditions and reservoir properties encountered globally as well as to engage with relevant regulatory bodies.

Technical Report

Components of CCS Infrastructure – Interim CO₂ Holding Options

  • 27 November 2023
  • Storage
  • Transport

This work, undertaken on behalf of IEAGHG by TNO and SINTEF, provides an overview of temporary / interim CO₂ storage, or ‘holding’, options (also called buffers) and investigates the role of buffer storage and its potential to create flexible and robust carbon capture and storage (CCS) chains. The report looks at current and emerging buffer technologies, conducts simulations to demonstrate the temporary storage required for given flow-rate scenarios and discusses the impact of buffer capacity on transport costs. In the report, the storage requested in the chain for normal operation is presented as " temporary storage" and storage to give buffer capacity is presented as " buffer storage". This report has focussed on buffering at the emitter site. The results of this study will benefit CO₂ storage site project developers, operators, financiers and regulators.

Technical Report

Classification of Total Storage Resources and Storage Coefficients

  • 1 November 2023
  • Storage

The CO₂ Storage Resources Management System (SRMS) is a classification scheme to quantify, classify and categorise CO₂ storage resources. It comprises ‘total storage resources’, which are understood as maximum (theoretical) storage quantities that could ever be accommodated in the subsurface. Comprising maximum mobile CO₂ in structural/stratigraphic traps, maximum residually trapped CO₂ in other parts of the formation, and maximum dissolution potential in remaining formation water. ‘Storable quantities’ are understood as accessible from one or several current or future projects. It is the sum of capacity, contingent and prospective resources. The concept of ‘storage coefficient’ ‘E’ is the ratio of the subsurface volume of CO₂ storable quantities to either the total storage resources or the pore volume. The calculation is arguably complicated as E is impacted by lithological heterogeneity, trapping structures, boundary conditions, injection rates, well spacing, fluid properties etc. Due to its complexity, there is much controversy on how to estimate E, with some arguing it should not be used at all and that reservoir simulation is a better path. However, estimates for E are used in most regional mapping studies. This study explores storage resource classification schemes and their evolution in understanding, the calculation of storage resources and the storage co-efficient. This is explored in terms of calculating E for CO₂ storage sites, through flow modelling and analytical solutions.

Technical Review

Risk Management Network Meeting Report

  • 29 September 2023
  • Event Proceedings
  • Storage

The Risk Management Network meeting was held as an in-person event with a particular focus on the risk of wells (particularly legacy wells) in a CCS project, looking at the topic from basin scale through to detailed characterisation of well materials and monitoring. Attended by over 75 delegates from 15 countries, the two day meeting was held at Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh, UK. It was kicked off by a welcome reception in the Lyell Centre (home to both BGS and the Institute for GeoEnergy Engineering) and was followed by a field excursion to explore the geological history of Arthur’s Seat in Edinburgh and a tour of a very new distillery located in an old train station within stone’s throw of Holyrood Park.

Technical Report

Prospective Integration of Geothermal Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage

  • 23 August 2023
  • Storage
  • Utilisation

The aim of the study is to provide a dispassionate review and overview of scenarios where geothermal energy and CO₂ utilisation and storage technologies can be combined for mutual benefit and contribute to Net Zero targets. Sourced from a rich body of literature from global research institutes and some demonstration projects many of the concepts identified have been conceptualised over the past 20 years and are still in the early concept stage. These concepts have been categorised, described and evaluated using qualitative and quantitative methods. And a map based screening exercise useful for initial evaluation of areas suitable for combined synergies has been undertaken.

Our most recent publications

Our authoritative, peer-reviewed publications cover topics that include carbon capture, transport, storage, monitoring, regulation, and more.

View All Publications
Technical Review

Insurance Coverage for CO₂ Storage Projects

  • 16 August 2024
  • Industry Insights
  • Storage

This report is a focused review of recent developments regarding insurance coverage for carbon dioxide (CO₂) geological storage projects. It seeks to address the following: what companies are offering or planning to offer insurance to CO₂ storage projects, what is the scope and duration of the coverage offered, and does coverage extend to the transportation of CO₂ to the project site? This work and report was prepared by Franz Hiebert.

Technical Review

CO₂ Storage Site Catalogue

  • 8 August 2024
  • Storage

This Technical Review provides an overview of 22 CO₂ storage sites from around the world. These include CO₂-EOR, commercial scale storage sites and a number of pilot and demonstration storage sites in both depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs and saline reservoirs. Its primary aim is to provide a convenient source of collated information with a specific focus on technical information that are in the public domain.

Technical Report

Power CCS: Potential for cost reductions and improvements

  • 5 August 2024
  • Capture
  • Costs of CCUS

CCS, in the context of power CCS technologies, will be an essential component of the portfolio of technologies required to reach net-zero emissions in the power sector. This study explores the potential to reduce the cost and accelerate the uptake of power CCS technologies.

Technical Review

7th Post-Combustion Capture Conference Summary

  • 1 April 2024
  • Capture
  • Event Proceedings

The 7th edition of the Post Combustion Capture Conference (PCCC-7) was held on the 25?28 September 2023 and was jointly hosted by the IEAGHG, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) and sponsored by Worley, Shell, and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. (MHI).

Get the latest CCS news and insights

Get essential news and updates from the CCS sector and the IEAGHG by email.

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Whatever you would like to know, our dedicated team of experts is here to help you. Just drop us an email and we will get back to you as soon as we can.

Contact Us Now