Interaction of CO₂ Storage with Subsurface Resources
Brad Field, Stefan Bachu, Mark Bunch, Rob Funnell, Sam Holloway, Rick Richardson
Citation: IEAGHG, "Interaction of CO₂ Storage with Subsurface Resources", 2013-08, April 2013.
Publication Overview
The objectives of the study were to: 1. Provide a comprehensive literature-based review of sub-surface exploitation activities that may affect storage operations, focussing in regions where large scale CCS development is currently focussed. 2. Provide a qualitative assessment of potential interactions and impacts using case study sedimentary basins. 3. Provide policy makers, regulators and developers with a checklist of potential sub surface resource interactions together with a preliminary explanation of possible impacts and management options 4. Where possible, provide case study examples of resource interaction issues have been successfully managed to enable multiple resource use
Publication Summary
- Other subsurface resources may exist at similar depths and localities and therefore interact with CO₂ Storage. These include oil and gas, coal, natural gas storage, saline aquifer minerals, geothermal energy, potable groundwater and waste water disposal.
- Interaction of CO₂ storage with other resources can be positive or negative depending on the geology, existing resources, economic potential and the regulatory environment.
- CO₂ storage operations may be feasible, both adjacent to other resource uses or at different stratigraphic levels in the same locality, particularly if there is no detrimental pressure connection.
- Resource use interactions can occur at the same time or sequentially.
- Regulatory agencies should consider the following stages when evaluating resource development in relation to geological storage of carbon dioxide: o Identify all resources within region/ basin, map their distribution and assess their quality. o Establish priority of use between the various resources and CO₂ storage. o Assess proposed CO₂ storage project – site characterisation, MMV plans, contingency and mitigation planning. o Review injection plans and achievability; assess if they might lead to conflict o Review abandonment plan, longer term MMV, liability transfer arrangements.
- Delays in establishing CO₂ storage regulations could not only inhibit CO₂ storage project development, they could lead to future, detrimental resource interactions.
Our most recent publications
Our authoritative, peer-reviewed publications cover topics that include carbon capture, transport, storage, monitoring, regulation, and more.
View All PublicationsGet the latest CCS news and insights
Get essential news and updates from the CCS sector and the IEAGHG by email.
Can’t find what you are looking for?
Whatever you would like to know, our dedicated team of experts is here to help you. Just drop us an email and we will get back to you as soon as we can.
Contact Us Now