8th Post Combustion Capture Conference Summary
- 10 March 2026
- Capture
- Event Proceedings
This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
Ludmilla Basava-Reddi
Citation: IEAGHG, "The 7th IEAGHG Monitoring Network Meeting", 2011-14, November 2011.
The theme for this year’s meeting centred on the 3 criteria for transfer of responsibility in the EU directive:
Seismic detection limits have been discussed for Otway, Ketzin and Nagaoka and it is clear that repeatability is key to be able to compare results over time and with modelling data. At Ketzin, monitoring results show that the plume migrated to a lesser extent than expected from the initial modelling due to the heterogeneity in the subsurface. This is within expected limits; however, history matching has been carried out since to improve the model. It will always be the case that the models improve with more information, but a range of models may show the expected plume limits. Breakthrough was also later than detected, which was unexpected, but not negative. This all shows how important it is to define monitoring and performance indicators. The talks from In Salah on In Sar show how even excellent datasets can have non-unique explanations. It can also be seen that combinations of tools can reduce overall uncertainty. Results from pilot sites are necessary for understanding and demonstrating processes as well as testing monitoring tool capabilities.
Our authoritative, peer-reviewed publications cover topics that include carbon capture, transport, storage, monitoring, regulation, and more.
View All PublicationsGet essential news and updates from the CCS sector and the IEAGHG by email.
Whatever you would like to know, our dedicated team of experts is here to help you. Just drop us an email and we will get back to you as soon as we can.
Contact Us Now