Measurement, reporting and verification and accounting for carbon dioxide removal in the context of both project-based approaches and national greenhouse gas inventories
- 15 October 2024
- Industry Insights
- Policy & Regulation
This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
IEAGHG
Citation: IEAGHG, "What Have We Learned from IEAGHG Storage Activities", 2009-TR1, February 2009.
This report summarises key learning points on CO₂ geological storage from Operating Phase 5 of the IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (IEA GHG), which commenced in 2005 and effectively coincided with the publication of the IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (IPCC SRCCS). IEA GHG activities revolve mainly around contracted studies and organisation of the international research networks. IEA GHG studies are chosen by programme members and sponsors from a wide list of proposals, ensuring those selected are focussed on topical technical issues. Study reports issued from 2005 onwards have contributed significant knowledge to major storage topics, including: regional capacity estimation; economics; environmental impact and risk assessment; well integrity and remediation of seepage; and development issues for deep saline formations.
Studies have highlighted the need for further research on environmental impact assessment in the context of CO2 geological storage. Although there is an existing knowledge base on the effects of CO2 on ecosystems, a number of gaps in knowledge have been highlighted. Regulatory and industry attitudes to risk assessment for CO2 geological storage were examined in a 2007 questionnaire-based study. The study found no major discrepancies between attitudes of the two groups to risk assessment, which will provide an essential framework for the regulation of storage. Network discussions have recognised performance and impact assessments as twin components of risk assessment, which forms part of a wider risk management process that incorporates monitoring and mitigation. These discussions have also highlighted the fact that current understanding of performance assessment and environmental impacts renders quantitative risk assessment as problematic.
Our authoritative, peer-reviewed publications cover topics that include carbon capture, transport, storage, monitoring, regulation, and more.
View All PublicationsGet essential news and updates from the CCS sector and the IEAGHG by email.
Whatever you would like to know, our dedicated team of experts is here to help you. Just drop us an email and we will get back to you as soon as we can.
Contact Us Now