This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.

Technology Collaboration Programme by IEA

The Role of Indices in Assessing the Maturity of CCUS Technologies and their Readiness for Deployment

Mark Ackiewicz, Gerdi Breembroek, Sara Budinis, Arthur Lee, Ryozo Tanaka, Treasure Ubador, Hans Jørgen Vinje

Citation: IEAGHG, "The Role of Indices in Assessing the Maturity of CCUS Technologies and their Readiness for Deployment", 2024-01, February 2024.

Download The Full Publication Now
The Role of Indices in Assessing the Maturity of CCUS Technologies and their Readiness for Deployment

Publication Overview

This study was undertaken on behalf of IEAGHG by Foresight Transitions Ltd. While a technology may be technically mature, it has become increasingly clear that the technology may not necessarily be considered commercially ‘bankable’ by investors. In this study, the potential for an index or indices to provide that confidence was explored. The findings from the study will be of interest to the broader energy community but, in particular, should benefit technology developers, CCUS end users, investors and policymakers.

Publication Summary

  1. Analysis and modelling have highlighted the essential role of carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) in the portfolio of technologies for cost-effectively achieving net zero. However, the window to achieve net-zero and remain within a 1.5°C carbon budget is shrinking rapidly and effective deployment of CCUS must accelerate.
  2. In its recent ‘Tracking Clean Energy Progress Report 2023’, where the International Energy Agency (IEA) assessed the progress of technologies to fulfil their potential on the path to net zero by 2050, CO₂ capture and utilisation was assessed as ‘More efforts needed’ and CO₂ transport and storage as ‘Not on track’.
  3. While CCUS technologies and their associated value chains are already technically mature and extensively deployed in certain industrial contexts, their ‘commercial readiness’ for deployment in a number of other industrial sectors, and the policy and regulatory frameworks required for them to be considered a ‘bankable’ asset by investors, are less well characterised and understood.
  4. The main barriers identified to CCUS being considered a bankable asset were related to commercial, policy and regulatory risk. Unless these risks were addressed effectively, it was likely that broader deployment at scale would be problematic.
  5. Means were considered to address these risks and to chart a path to bankability. The value of using an index, in much the same way that the technology readiness level (TRL) index is used for technology development, was explored as the focus of this study, i.e., to examine whether an index to assess the commercial maturity of CCUS technology would be of practical value. Insights were sought regarding the role that commercial readiness indices might play in providing the relevant market signals for CCUS to be considered a bankable asset.
  6. Indices are already applied in many spheres. Over 45 indices relevant to commercial, policy, regulatory and societal readiness were mapped and, of these, 38 were critically reviewed. Analysis found that the indices reviewed could be adapted to cover all aspects likely to be relevant to the establishment and upscaling of CCUS.
  7. In addition to reviewing the value of indices online, consultations via interviews and workshops were undertaken with specialists drawn from across the CCUS project developer community – project developers, policymakers, finance specialists, regulators, the environmental NGO community and representatives of civil society. Views were taken on which aspects of commercial readiness were important to the various stakeholders, as well as the stakeholders’ views on their perceived value of a bespoke index.
  8. Due to the substantial complexity already facing stakeholders in addressing commercial, policy and regulatory risk, consensus from the consultations found the perceived benefits of applying ‘commercial readiness’ indices to CCUS to be limited. CCUS specialists felt the investment in resources that would enable the wide range of audiences to understand new CCUS-relevant indices would be a distraction.
  9. Consultees also stressed that they viewed metrics as more important and more useful than indices to specific stakeholders. Metrics in existence, for example, credit ratings, CO₂ capture efficiency and geological pore space were already used extensively. The relevant communities and audiences understood these long-established metrics; they are ubiquitous and have widespread application and acceptance.
  10. To overcome commercial barriers, views contended that, rather than developing indices, there was a need for a strengthening of relationships between stakeholders integral to the scaling of the sector. This would enhance stakeholder capacity, knowledge transfer, shared awareness of risks, uncertainty and complexity. For effective strengthening of relationships, CCUS projects would need to be constructed and operated via long-term government CCUS implementation plans, i.e., firm and stable policies in place.
  11. Moreover, the generation of a generic index or generic indices to provide insights to the broader commercial factors which need to be considered for CCUS bankability was considered a distraction by the majority of CCUS specialists. While a generic index such as the Commercial Readiness Index, as created and used by the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA), was not considered a priority, metrics were seen as having an important role in identifying aspects of CCUS commercial readiness and deployability.
  12. It was felt that the main drawback of the application of indices in this context was the time and resource that would be expended generating the capacity to understand them across a broad range of audiences.
  13. Barriers to bankability and widespread deployment of CCUS, as cited by specialists, ranged from affordability, lack of institutional knowledge, lack of policy champions, inadequate knowledge sharing and the need for the appropriate policy design. There was, however, a lack of agreement as to which of these specific barriers were a priority to be addressed.
  14. A set of important considerations regarding the process of CCUS policy design were raised by stakeholders, notably:
    1. There was a need for an overarching vision and narrative as to the role of CCUS in addressing net zero;
    2. Societal engagement mechanisms play an integral role to CCUS policy design processes; and that
    3. CCUS policy needs to account for the varying levels of risk appetite of industrial stakeholders, sectors and investors that were looking to adopt CCUS.

Download Publication

Access the complete publication in PDF format.

Download Now

Related Publications

View similar publications.

View All Publications
Technical Review

Insurance Coverage for CO₂ Storage Projects

  • 16 August 2024
  • Industry Insights
  • Storage

This report is a focused review of recent developments regarding insurance coverage for carbon dioxide (CO₂) geological storage projects. It seeks to address the following: what companies are offering or planning to offer insurance to CO₂ storage projects, what is the scope and duration of the coverage offered, and does coverage extend to the transportation of CO₂ to the project site? This work and report was prepared by Franz Hiebert.

Technical Report

Methologies and Technologies for Mitigation

  • 1 December 2023
  • Industry Insights

The driver behind this study is to develop a report built on the on the previous IEAGHG report on methods of leakage mitigation (2007/11). The proposed study should focus on current mitigation and remediation methods that may be applied or considered in site specific conditions in the event of unpredicted CO₂ migration. Each geological storage site will have an adaptive site specific monitoring plan, based on a risk assessment. Detection of a significant irregularity may involve supplementing the monitoring program, in order to detect a possible leak and if necessary engaging mitigation measures.

Technical Review

A bibliometric analysis of GHGT abstract submissions

  • 14 June 2023
  • Industry Insights

This technical review provides an insight into how the focus of research in the field of Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) has evolved across a decade, from 2012–2022. It is designed to help understand where the most research has been conducted, and to see where CCUS research is going.

Technical Report

Review of Constructability and Operational Challenges faced by CCUS projects

  • 9 September 2020
  • Industry Insights

IEAGHG has commissioned several technical studies linked to large CCS projects1. Although constructability and operational challenges have been identified in previous IEAGHG reports, some aspects were unique due to the locations where the large CCS projects were implemented. These included the status of the initial facilities and other techno-economic and financial aspects of the specific CCUS projects. IEAGHG identified the need to provide a guide on constructability and operation for new CCS users. The objective of this study is to collect information from CCS projects to support the decisions during the transition from the planning to the execution phase. This study analysed a complete list of large CCUS projects from which relevant experience could be extracted. The projects were divided into three categories: operating projects; under construction or at advanced development; and cancelled projects. Based on the analysed projects, this study has delivered an assessment of potential key areas for success, and a decision tool guide for future projects

Technical Report

CCS in Energy and Climate Scenarios

  • 1 July 2019
  • Industry Insights

The purpose of IAMs is to quantify the interactions and trade-offs between societal demands for energy, economic and environmental services, using a systems approach. These systems are typically the energy system, the economy, the earth-land system, the water system and atmospheric climate system, although every IAM does not necessarily include all these systems and have varying

Technical Report

Sustainability in Petrochemicals

  • 1 February 2019
  • Capture
  • Industry Insights

This report investigates a unique combination of these industry drivers on the historic, current and future status of the petrochemical industry to gain insight into the sustainability of petrochemicals. Three categories of petrochemicals are subject to analysis, namely methanol, olefins and ammonia/urea. For each of these petrochemicals, the following series of studies are formed and analysed in aggregate to gain insight in to the sustainability prospects of the industry:<!– wp:acf/columns {"name":"acf/columns","data":{"padding_top":"1","_padding_top":"field_columns_fields_padding_top","padding_bottom":"1","_padding_bottom":"field_columns_fields_padding_bottom","margin_top":"0","_margin_top":"field_columns_fields_margin_top","margin_bottom":"0","_margin_bottom":"field_columns_fields_margin_bottom"},"mode":"preview"} –> <!– wp:acf/column-content {"name":"acf/column-content","mode":"preview"} –> <!– wp:list –><ul><!– wp:list-item –><!– wp:list-item –><li>An assessment of the historic and current status of market trade, including trends in end-uses, feedstocks, demand, production and international trade. Demand projections for each chemical are made based on collected data.</li><!– /wp:list-item –><!– /wp:list-item –> <!– wp:list-item –><!– wp:list-item –><li>Process engineering characterisation of the current and low carbon alternative routes and feedstocks to produce the key petrochemical productions.</li><!– /wp:list-item –><!– /wp:list-item –> <!– wp:list-item –><!– wp:list-item –><li>Environmental life cycle assessment of the various feedstocks and production methods for each petrochemical and a contribution analysis of the key environmental impacts.</li><!– /wp:list-item –><!– /wp:list-item –> <!– wp:list-item –><!– wp:list-item –><li>Market projection of petrochemical production and technology mixes for a key region China, for the time period 2010 – 2050.</li><!– /wp:list-item –><!– /wp:list-item –> <!– wp:list-item –><!– wp:list-item –><li>A series of expert stakeholder interviews on views of how the petrochemical industry may progress in terms of demand, costs, environmental impacts and policy drivers.</li><!– /wp:list-item –><!– /wp:list-item –></ul><!– /wp:list –> <!– /wp:acf/column-content –> <!– /wp:acf/columns –>

Technical Report

The CCS Project at Air Products’ Port Arthur Hydrogen Production Facility

  • 1 December 2018
  • Industry Insights

In April 2013, the first commercial-scale, steam methane reformer hydrogen production facility incorporating vacuum-swing adsorption carbon capture gas separation technology began full-scale operation at Air Products’ facilities located on the site of the Valero Port Arthur Refinery in Texas, USA. This report summarizes the experience of Air Products and its partners that will provide valuable insights to other petroleum refining and petrochemical industrial facilities that wish to reduce their lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions through CCUS.

Technical Report

Enabling CCS Clusters

  • 1 February 2018
  • Industry Insights

It is widely considered that deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) for clusters of energy intensive industries (EIIs) will become vital for meeting long-term greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets, and is a cost effective way for doing so, according to organisations such as the International Energy Agency (IEA) and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In addition, it will be important to develop the related finance mechanism quickly to prevent carbon leakage, i.e. businesses transferring operations to places with less stringent GHG emission standards. Recent evidence highlights there might be different needs and challenges in deployment of industrial clusters, compared to those involving power generation. IEAGHG’s Technical Report 2015/03 “Carbon capture and storage cluster projects: review and future opportunities” reviews 12 CCS cluster projects and finds that the most successful clusters are currently based on CO₂-EOR in North America. This is to be expected as EOR provides a commercial benefit to investors in such activities.Further requirements for ICCS clusters include: generating confidence for per-investment in CCS infrastructure, new methods to attract international investment and systematic development of CCS cluster business plans. However, more information is necessary regarding the transferability of conclusions for CCS clusters based on power generation incentives, such as a UK Contract for Difference (CfD), to those involving multiple industry sectors, and especially EIIs.This study examines the economic and commercial arrangements needed to enable the global deployment of industrial CCS clusters. Over a period of eight months, with significant input from stakeholders from industry, government and the investment community, the project has identified the key enablers to unlock private investment in ICCS and developed four business models, which are expected to work in various regions around the world including North America, Europe, Australia and China.

Technical Review

Gas Supply Chain Emissions

  • 1 October 2017
  • Industry Insights

This technical review has been undertaken with the aim of providing a summary of the current status of research into greenhouse gas emissions in the natural gas supply chain. Although 90% or more of the CO<sub>2</sub> produced at gas fired power plants can be captured, emissions from the supply chain may reduce the near-zero-emission image of gas as an energy source. Emissions are predominantly from two sources: <ol> <!– wp:list-item –><!– wp:list-item –><li>Methane emissions during production and also fugitive emissions during transport.</li><!– /wp:list-item –><!– /wp:list-item –> <!– wp:list-item –><!– wp:list-item –><li>CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from gas production installations, gas purification plants, pipeline compressors, LNG liquefaction plants, ships and receiving terminals.</li><!– /wp:list-item –><!– /wp:list-item –> </ol>

Our most recent publications

Our authoritative, peer-reviewed publications cover topics that include carbon capture, transport, storage, monitoring, regulation, and more.

View All Publications
Technical Review

Insurance Coverage for CO₂ Storage Projects

  • 16 August 2024
  • Industry Insights
  • Storage

This report is a focused review of recent developments regarding insurance coverage for carbon dioxide (CO₂) geological storage projects. It seeks to address the following: what companies are offering or planning to offer insurance to CO₂ storage projects, what is the scope and duration of the coverage offered, and does coverage extend to the transportation of CO₂ to the project site? This work and report was prepared by Franz Hiebert.

Technical Review

CO₂ Storage Site Catalogue

  • 8 August 2024
  • Storage

This Technical Review provides an overview of 22 CO₂ storage sites from around the world. These include CO₂-EOR, commercial scale storage sites and a number of pilot and demonstration storage sites in both depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs and saline reservoirs. Its primary aim is to provide a convenient source of collated information with a specific focus on technical information that are in the public domain.

Technical Report

Power CCS: Potential for cost reductions and improvements

  • 5 August 2024
  • Capture
  • Costs of CCUS

CCS, in the context of power CCS technologies, will be an essential component of the portfolio of technologies required to reach net-zero emissions in the power sector. This study explores the potential to reduce the cost and accelerate the uptake of power CCS technologies.

Technical Review

7th Post-Combustion Capture Conference Summary

  • 1 April 2024
  • Capture
  • Event Proceedings

The 7th edition of the Post Combustion Capture Conference (PCCC-7) was held on the 25?28 September 2023 and was jointly hosted by the IEAGHG, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) and sponsored by Worley, Shell, and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. (MHI).

Technical Report

Clean steel an environmental and technoeconomic outlook of a disruptive technology

  • 1 March 2024
  • Capture
  • Costs of CCUS

This study primarily presents a comparative analysis of steelmaking pathways to cost-effectively decarbonise a steel mill, taking a life-cycle perspective on associated environmental impacts. The roll-out of clean steel technologies is envisioned to have a significant implication for support infrastructure. Therefore, a secondary objective of the study is to gain insights into the primary energy and infrastructure implications associated with large-scale deployment of different steel decarbonisation pathways. Clean steel production will likely be more expensive than steel produced today; this poses additional economic strains on steel producers and consumers. Consequently, a third objective is to estimate the price premium that clean steel could command in existing and future markets. Further, this study formulates recommendations for key stakeholders to support the sector and outlines recommendations for further work.

Get the latest CCS news and insights

Get essential news and updates from the CCS sector and the IEAGHG by email.

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Whatever you would like to know, our dedicated team of experts is here to help you. Just drop us an email and we will get back to you as soon as we can.

Contact Us Now