Technical Review
8th Post Combustion Capture Conference Summary
- 10 March 2026
- Capture
- Event Proceedings
Start-up and Shutdown Protocol for Natural Gas-fired Power Stations with CO₂ Capture
Mai Bui, Niall Mac Dowell
Citation: IEAGHG, "Start-up and Shutdown Protocol for Natural Gas-fired Power Stations with CO₂ Capture", 2022-08, August 2022.
Publication Overview
In modern power grids, a power plant with CO₂ capture will be required to operate as a low-carbon, flexible, dispatchable power generator. A recent IEAGHG study showed it is possible to achieve net-zero CO₂ emissions from coal-fired and gas-fired power generation by employing higher capture rates and, in the case of coal-fired generation, by employing a mix of capture rates and biomass.
Publication Summary
- With increased penetration of intermittent renewables, however, greater load-following is likely and a rise in the frequency of start-up/shutdown (SUSD) cycles would be expected. If it transpired that frequent SUSD cycles resulted in appreciable CO₂ emissions, it could undermine the value proposition of including modern, flexible, dispatchable fossil fuel power generation assets in the grid even though CCUS applied to them could enhance energy security and grid resilience.
- Limited work to-date has focused on the impact of start-up and shutdown of CO₂ capture plants, particularly with respect to the time required and the fugitive CO₂ emissions arising. This study broadens understanding of the process dynamics during start-up and shutdown, identifying key factors that impact CO₂ capture performance and operability associated with a natural gas-fired combined heat and power3 (CHP) plant.
- To optimise CO₂ capture performance during start-up and shutdown, factors shown to be important include the solvent inventory volume, the initial start-up temperature (cold vs hot) and the timing of steam availability.
- Using a larger solvent inventory can be beneficial in terms of maximising the cumulative CO₂ capture rate from start-up, through steady state operation and shutdown. While the effect of solvent inventory volume is negligible for hot start-ups, there is significant improvement in cumulative CO₂ capture in the case of cold start-ups.
- Overall, hot start-ups showed a significantly higher cumulative CO₂ capture rate and lower specific reboiler duty compared to cold start-ups. With a low start-up solvent loading (0.05–0.11 mol CO₂/mol amine), high online CO₂ capture rates of 98–99% were achieved during start-up, occurring immediately after the introduction of flue gas to the system. The ability to sustain these high CO₂ capture rates depends on the volume of the solvent inventory, the amine concentration, the starting solvent CO₂ loading, and the timing of steam supply to the reboiler.
- Results indicate the importance of timely steam supply during start-up. Any delay in steam supply to the capture plant significantly reduces the cumulative CO₂ capture rate, thereby greatly increasing the residual CO₂ emissions. Start-up with preheating was shown to be a potentially valuable approach. Under specific operating conditions, preheating can provide higher cumulative CO₂ capture rates during start-up of the capture plant, thereby minimising the residual CO₂ emissions. To maximise the value of preheating, a higher flow rate of steam supply can heat the system much faster, but the duration of preheating must be optimised to minimise residual CO₂ emissions associated with steam energy.
- Measures applied during hot start-up, such as high preheating and lower solvent loading, were shown to markedly improve capture performance. For example, a cumulative CO₂ capture rate of 98.8% was achieved compared to the lower cumulative CO₂ capture rates of between 90.0 to 90.3% using “conventional” hot start-up protocols. However, the specific reboiler duty was higher with the improved measures, at 5.58 MJ/kg CO₂, compared to values of 3.76–4.03 MJ/kg CO₂ (depending on solvent inventory volume) for the conventional start-up tests.
- In the context of a net-zero energy system, the need for operational flexibility will rise. Hence, the ability to maximise the CO₂ capture rate during start-up and shutdown would be highly valuable as it will reduce residual CO₂ emissions from power plants, thus easing the need for carbon offsets from CO₂ removal technologies, e.g., bioenergy with CCS, or direct air capture.
- The evaluation has helped identify novel operational strategies that can minimise both the time taken for start-up and shutdown and the CO₂ emissions associated with these operations.
- Finally, it should be noted that, while the detailed performance metrics, measurements and observations were plant, scale and solvent specific, the high-level insights drawn from this work should remain broadly applicable
Our most recent publications
Our authoritative, peer-reviewed publications cover topics that include carbon capture, transport, storage, monitoring, regulation, and more.
View All Publications
Get the latest CCS news and insights
Get essential news and updates from the CCS sector and the IEAGHG by email.
Can’t find what you are looking for?
Whatever you would like to know, our dedicated team of experts is here to help you. Just drop us an email and we will get back to you as soon as we can.
Contact Us Now