Reflections from the 2026 Knowledge Sharing CCS & CDR Summit

The Knowledge Sharing Summit brought together a diverse group of professionals with a common goal: improving how we exchange ideas, insights, and experience across organisations and disciplines. At a time when the pace of innovation continues to accelerate, the ability to effectively share knowledge is no longer a “nice to have” – it’s essential.

Over 400 attendees from 40 countries joined hosts Gassnova and co-hosts IEAGHG, CEM CCUS Initiative, Mission Innovation CDR, and Zero Emissions Platform in Sandefjord, Norway, from the 14^th to the 17^th of April. The event agenda brought together policymakers, industry leaders and researchers for high-level keynotes, project updates, panel discussions, workshops and side events covering the full CCUS value chain. A strong emphasis was placed on real-world deployment, including updates on flagship projects like Longship.

IEAGHG was heavily involved in three workshops on day 2 of the event: on insuring CCUS and CDR projects, on integrating technologies and processes for cost-effective CO₂ specifications over the CCS value chain, and one on CCUS/CDR MRV in action: challenges, opportunities, and implementation strategies. In addition, IEAGHG co-organised a full-day BioCCUS/CDR Workshop on Day 3. Site visits to Northern Lights, Technology Centre Mongstad, Brevik CCS and Oslo CCS  took place on Day 3 and Day 4 (to give those attending the side events the chance to take part as well).

What stood out throughout was the openness of the discussions. Rather than focusing solely on successes, many sessions explored the challenges of knowledge sharing, from breaking down silos to ensuring that technical expertise is communicated in an accessible and actionable manner. This honesty created a more meaningful dialogue and allowed for practical takeaways that can be applied in real-world contexts.

A recurring theme throughout the summit was the importance of translation – not just across languages, but across levels of expertise. Collaboration and knowledge sharing can be harder for the CCS/CDR sector, due to the many different processes involved in the value chain. Technical specialists, policymakers, and communicators all play a role in ensuring that knowledge is not only generated, but understood and used effectively. Bridging these gaps is critical, particularly in complex fields where clarity can directly influence decision-making. Progressive, yet stable policy frameworks are equally important.

Another key takeaway was the role of structure in knowledge sharing. While informal exchanges remain valuable, there is increasing recognition that more deliberate frameworks are needed to capture, curate, and disseminate information. Whether through digital platforms, collaborative networks, or organisational processes, structured approaches can significantly enhance the reach and impact of shared knowledge.

Some more specific insights from the BioCCUS/CDR Workshop include the importance of clear accounting rules, realistic leakage assessments and robust MRV frameworks, with the work of the Northern Lights project in this area demonstrating leadership. The role of voluntary carbon markets was seen as a ‘test and innovation ground’. These experiences can then be adapted and translated for compliance markets. Inventory visibility is also important, i.e. removal credits claimed in carbon markets need to show in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (NGHGI).

Beyond the sessions themselves, the knowledge sharing summit highlighted the value of connection. Conversations continued well outside the formal agenda, reinforcing that knowledge sharing is as much about people as it is about content. Building relationships creates the trust needed for open exchange – and often leads to collaboration long after the event has ended.